Showing posts with label parallel universe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parallel universe. Show all posts

Study claims an ‘anti-universe’ where time is backwards may exist next to ours

According to a new study, a “anti-universe” where time goes backwards could exist alongside ours.

The idea is based on the fact that nature includes fundamental symmetries, which experts believe could apply to the entire cosmos. The hypothesis was discussed in the Annals of Physics publication.

It goes over a common physics concept known as Charge, Parity, and Time (CPT) symmetry. CPT symmetry is recognized as one of the laws of physics and means things like charge and time can be inverted after a transformative process.

Scientists think the Big Bang, which created the universe, was definitely transformational, and so the CPT theory could apply. The researchers believe that before the Big Bang, there was a ‘backwards universe,’ which was later inverted to form the cosmos we live in today.

They explained: “We investigate the idea that the universe before the Big Bang is the CPT reflection of the universe after the bang, both classically and quantum mechanically.”

And, added: “The universe before the bang and the universe after the bang may be viewed as a universe/anti-universe pair, emerging directly into the hot, radiation-dominated era we observe in our past.

“This, in turn, leads to a remarkably economical explanation of the cosmological dark matter.”

According to the wild theory, the presence of dark matter in our world isn’t so mysterious after all. The scientists propose that dark matter is made up of right-handed neutrinos, a type of ghostly particle. Neutrino particles exist in our universe, but they only spin left.


Scientists find it strange that they haven’t discovered a version that spins to the right, as the principles of physics suggest they should.


The researchers believe that the appropriate spinning particles may be invisible in our universe and are simply represented by dark matter.


Little is known about dark matter in the cosmos, except that it is invisible but has a physical influence on other objects.


Researchers think investigating neutrino particles and dark matter further could potentially be a step in proving the ‘anti-universe’ theory.


Scientists do not believe humans will be able to visit the suggested ‘anti-universe’ because it occurred before the Big Bang.

This is Crazy: Scientists See Two Versions Of Reality Existing At The Same Time In A Quantum Experiment

We are aware of how skewed our perception of reality is. How we see the world is shaped by our senses, our societies, and our knowledge. 

And you may want to rethink your belief that science will always provide you with objective reality.

Physicists can now verify a hypothesis that Nobel Prize winner Eugen Wigner initially put out in 1961. 

The setting of the experiment, dubbed "Wigner's Friend," is not too difficult. You begin with a quantum system that is in superposition, which implies that both of its states exist concurrently up to the point of measurement. In this example, the polarisation (the axis on which a photon spins) is both horizontal and vertical.

When they measure it, the system will collapse and the photon will be stuck into one of those two states. Wigner's buddy is in the lab doing the experiment. However, the quantum system—which, crucially, also includes the lab—remains in superposition for Wigner, who is outside the lab and uninformed of the outcome of the experiment. 

Despite having different outcomes, they are both accurate. So, two objective realities, Wigner's and Wigner's friend's seem to coexist. (This is comparable to Schrödinger's cat, a thought experiment also involving superposition, assuming Schrödinger and his cat-in-a-box were both in a box.) And that's a problem.

It has been impossible to test this theory for a very long time. Wigner finds it difficult to calculate the quantum mechanics formula after seeing his buddy do an experiment. However, owing to recent advances, scientists were able to create a quantum mechanics experiment that would precisely replicate that.

A cutting-edge six-photon experiment and the system's four entangled observers demonstrated that while one component of the system generated a measurement, the other revealed that the measurement had not been made. 

At once, two realities were measured. According to the study, this supports the claim made by quantum theories whose framework already takes observer dependence into account.

“This calls into question the objective status of the facts established by the two observers,” the scientists write in their paper, which is available to read on ArXiv.

Can their disparate records be reconciled, or are they fundamentally incompatible—making it impossible for them to be regarded as objective, observer-independent "facts of the world"?

The influence and limits of the observers are well understood, despite the fact that science is the finest instrument we have for understanding reality. Observers may not see simultaneous occurrences at the same time, according to relativity. 

We learn from quantum physics that observers have an impact on their experiments. Now it seems that two worlds may exist simultaneously, at least at the quantum level.

Reference(s): MIT Technology Review

Multiverse: Astronomers have possibly found evidence for infinite number of parallel universes

Astronomers refer to it as the multiverse. There are multiple universes in this one. 

Physicists define more than one as an infinite number. These innumerable universes coexist in higher levels that our senses are incapable of directly experiencing.

Nonetheless, astronomers and cosmologists appear to be increasingly using the multiverse to explain baffling observations.

The stakes are really high. Each alternate universe has an own version of reality. There will be one in which you wrote this column and I read it; another in which the Guardian is an alt-right propaganda rag; and yet another in which Donald Trump uses Twitter to distribute only adorable cat videos.

The latest piece of evidence supporting a multiverse comes from the Royal Astronomical Society in the United Kingdom. They recently published a study on the "cold spot." This is an extremely chilly area of space detected in the radiation produced by the Universe's birth around 13 billion years ago.

The cold spot was discovered in 2004 by NASA's WMAP satellite and verified in 2013 by ESA's Planck spacecraft. It's quite perplexing. Most astronomers and cosmologists feel it is exceedingly improbable to have been formed during the creation of the universe since it is mathematically difficult to explain using the prevailing explanation, known as inflation.

This new study claims to rule out a more mundane explanation: that the chilly region is an optical illusion caused by a lack of adjacent galaxies.


One of the study’s authors, Professor Tom Shanks of Durham University, told the RAS, “We can’t entirely rule out that the Spot is caused by an unlikely fluctuation explained by the standard [theory of the Big Bang]. But if that isn’t the answer, then there are more exotic explanations. Perhaps the most exciting of these is that the Cold Spot was caused by a collision between our universe and another bubble universe. If further, more detailed, analysis … proves this to be the case then the Cold Spot might be taken as the first evidence for the multiverse.”

That's some serious thinking. But, if there is a multiverse, scientists must recognize that the ultimate goal of physics - explaining why our universe is the way it is - may be permanently out of grasp.

Physics' ultimate goal has been to explain why our cosmos takes the shape it does. This requires explaining why certain fundamental quantities have the values that they do. For example, the speed of light, the mass of an electron, and the gravitational interaction strength.

However, if there is a multiverse, that quest may be doomed to failure.


As there are an endless number of universes that are similar but somewhat different (such as the one in which you wrote this column rather than me), there will also be an infinite number in which the basic principles of physics are different.


As a result, every potential physics combination is tested across the multiverse. Inevitably, by pure chance, at least one will have the conditions we see around us now. It's just a huge old accident, which doesn't seem very rewarding.


Ironically, one of the most ardent opponents of the multiverse idea is one of its original founders. Princeton University's Paul Steinhardt contributed to the development of inflation, the theory of the start of our world. It's the one who can't explain the cold spot while still giving rise to the multiverse since, according to its arithmetic, once a universe begins to form, it causes more to form indefinitely.


However, Steinhardt rejected his own theory.


In 2014, he told Scientific American magazine, “Our observable universe would be just one possibility out of a continuous spectrum of outcomes. So, we have not explained any feature of the universe by introducing inflation after all. We have just shifted the problem of the original big bang model (how can we explain our simple universe when there is a nearly infinite variety of possibilities that could emerge from the big bang?) to the inflationary model (how can we explain our simple universe when there is a nearly infinite variety of possibilities that could emerge in a multiverse?).”


To put it another way, a multiverse does not sound appealing. It would go right to the heart of physics' purpose. Nature, of course, is unconcerned about this. Perhaps the universe really is this way, and we just have to accept it. Certainly, many people are willing to defend the multiverse as a credible line of thought.


If we truly live in a multiverse, we may rest confident that there is an alternate version of you and me out there who has already figured all of this out (and won a Nobel prize for the effort).

The Big Bang May Have Created A ‘Mirror Universe’, Where Time Runs Backwards



Three physicists from the prestigious Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, in Waterloo, Canada, proposed an extraordinary idea: from the Big Bang not only the Universe we know but also another one that is ‘its image in the mirror’ arose.


A Universe in which everything happens backward and expands backward in time. From our point of view, in effect, that Universe ‘on the other side of the Big Bang’ advances… into the past.


In an article then published in ‘Physical Review Letters‘, the physicists Latham Boyle, Keran Finn, and Neil Turok thus argued that the Universe we live in is only a part of the real Universe and that if so two of the largest problems facing physicists (namely, dark matter and inflation) would cease to make sense.


In fact, dark matter, the mysterious substance that accounts for almost a third of the mass of the Universe and that scientists are unable to observe, would be nothing more than a new type of neutrino (not yet observed). And the period of inflation, which exponentially expanded the size of the Universe shortly after the Big Bang and whose mechanism is still unknown, would simply no longer be necessary.


Now, in a new study just published in the ‘Journal of Physics’, the same researchers extend their work and explore what this ‘anti-Universe’ in which everything goes backward would be like. And their conclusions are really fascinating. As astrophysicist Paul Sutter explains in ‘ Live Science ‘, future experiments to search for gravitational waves, or to specify the mass of the neutrino, could clarify, in the coming years, whether or not this mirror Universe really exists.


CPT symmetry


In our Universe, there is a set of fundamental symmetries from which none of the forces of nature can escape. In fact, all the equations that best describe reality, from Newton’s Universal Gravitation to Maxwell’s Electrodynamics, Einstein’s Relativity or Quantum Mechanics fit, with rare exceptions, these fundamental symmetries. The Universe, for example, ‘works’ just as well whether time flows forward or backward, we assume


The most important of these symmetries are Charge (if we change the charge of all particles in interaction to their opposite charge the interaction will be the same); Parity (if we observe the mirror image of interaction, its result will be the same); and Time (if we look at an interaction backward in time, it will work exactly the same). By its initials (‘C’ for Charge, ‘P’ for Parity, and ‘T’ for Time), the combination of these three symmetries is called CPT symmetry.


It is true that violations sometimes occur, but so far no one has observed a violation of all three symmetries at the same time. Therefore, in their new work Boyle, Finn and Turok propose to extend this combined symmetry beyond the forces of nature and take it to the entire Universe. In Sutter’s words, “the idea extends this symmetry and instead of applying it only to the ‘actors’ of the Universe (forces and fields) it applies it to the ‘stage’ itself, the entire physical object of the Universe.”


A simple glance ‘out there’ is enough to prove that the Universe is not symmetrical. And although changing the three parameters in the equations (Charge, Parity, and Time) does not alter the results of any specific interaction, the truth is that, overall, in our Universe time only moves in one direction, space expands and never it contracts and there is much more matter than antimatter. It is as if the ‘other half is missing.


Therefore, the authors of the study explain, that if the Universe follows the CPT symmetry, there must necessarily be a mirror-image cosmos that balances ours. This cosmos would have all the opposite charges that we have, it would be the mirror image of ours and, from our perspective, it would go back in time instead of forward. The Universe in which we live, then, would be only one of two ‘twins’. And together, the two universes would obey the CPT symmetry.


What would that universe look like upside down?


But what consequences would such a Universe have? According to the authors of the study, a universe that respects the CPT symmetry would expand naturally and fill with particles, without the need for an initial (theoretical) period of extremely rapid expansion, and inflation, whose mechanics are uncertain.


And second, that symmetrical universe would add, as Sutter explains in Live Science, some neutrinos to the mix; “There are three known flavors of neutrinos: the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino, and the tau neutrino. Strangely, all three ‘flavors’ of these neutrinos are ‘left-handed’ (referring to the direction of their spin relative to their motion). All other particles known to physics have left- and right-hand varieties, so physicists have long wondered if additional ‘right-hand’ neutrinos exist as well.”


Well, a Universe that respects the CPT symmetry requires the existence of at least one type of ‘right-handed’ neutrino. One that would be practically invisible to the instruments of scientists, and that would only influence the rest of the Universe through gravity. Does it ring a bell? An invisible particle that pervades the Universe and only interacts through gravity is the perfect definition of dark matter…


We can never see it


Unfortunately, we will never have access to that other twin Universe because, by all accounts, if it exists it will be ‘behind’ the Big Bang and therefore ‘before’ our own half of the Universe. So we will have to make do with theoretical studies. Or maybe not?


Boyle, Finn, and Turok offer in their article some clues that could lead to observations that reveal the existence of this mirror Universe. For example, one of the predictions for this CPT Universe is that, among the various types of neutrinos, there should be at least one type that is completely massless. And it so happens that, so far at least, physicists have only been able to set upper limits on the masses of neutrinos. If they were able to conclusively measure those masses and one of them turned out to have no mass at all, that would be a huge boost to the idea of ​​a CPT symmetric universe.


Finally, as has been said, the model maintains that an inflation event never occurred. But physicists who believe in it say that the inflation, when it happened, must have shaken space tremendously, filling it with Gravitational waves. Many researchers are looking for such ‘primordial waves’, but in a Universe with CPT symmetry, they shouldn’t exist. So if no one finds them in the end, it would be another clue that the CPT mirror universe model is correct.


Image Description: This is what our universe looks like to x-ray eyes


Reference(s): Research Paper, Livescience

This is Crazy: Scientists See Two Versions Of Reality Existing At The Same Time In A Quantum Experiment


We are aware of how skewed our perception of reality is. How we see the world is shaped by our senses, our societies, and our knowledge. 


And you may want to rethink your belief that science will always provide you with objective reality.


Physicists can now verify a hypothesis that Nobel Prize winner Eugen Wigner initially put out in 1961. 


The setting of the experiment, dubbed "Wigner's Friend," is not too difficult. You begin with a quantum system that is in superposition, which implies that both of its states exist concurrently up to the point of measurement. In this example, the polarisation (the axis on which a photon spins) is both horizontal and vertical.


When they measure it, the system will collapse and the photon will be stuck into one of those two states. Wigner's buddy is in the lab doing the experiment. However, the quantum system—which, crucially, also includes the lab—remains in superposition for Wigner, who is outside the lab and uninformed of the outcome of the experiment. 


Despite having different outcomes, they are both accurate. So, two objective realities, Wigner's and Wigner's friend's seem to coexist. (This is comparable to Schrödinger's cat, a thought experiment also involving superposition, assuming Schrödinger and his cat-in-a-box were both in a box.) And that's a problem.


It has been impossible to test this theory for a very long time. Wigner finds it difficult to calculate the quantum mechanics formula after seeing his buddy do an experiment. However, owing to recent advances, scientists were able to create a quantum mechanics experiment that would precisely replicate that.


A cutting-edge six-photon experiment and the system's four entangled observers demonstrated that while one component of the system generated a measurement, the other revealed that the measurement had not been made. 


At once, two realities were measured. According to the study, this supports the claim made by quantum theories whose framework already takes observer dependence into account.


“This calls into question the objective status of the facts established by the two observers,” the scientists write in their paper, which is available to read on ArXiv.


Can their disparate records be reconciled, or are they fundamentally incompatible—making it impossible for them to be regarded as objective, observer-independent "facts of the world"?


The influence and limits of the observers are well understood, despite the fact that science is the finest instrument we have for understanding reality. Observers may not see simultaneous occurrences at the same time, according to relativity. 


We learn from quantum physics that observers have an impact on their experiments. Now it seems that two worlds may exist simultaneously, at least at the quantum level.


Reference(s): MIT Technology Review

Another universe existed before ours – and energy from it is coming out of black holes

An older universe existed before the Big Bang, and proof for its existence can still be found in black holes, according to a Nobel Prize-winning physicist.


Sir Roger Penrose made the assertion after receiving the award for advances in Einstein's general theory of relativity and proof of black hole existence.


Sir Roger contends that inexplicable regions of electromagnetic radiation in the sky, known as 'Hawking Points,' represent vestiges of an earlier universe.


It is part of the "conformal cyclic cosmology" universe hypothesis, and it is proposed that these spots constitute the final outflow of energy known as "Hawking radiation," conveyed by black holes from the older cosmos.


A black hole is an area of space where stuff has collapsed on itself and has such a strong gravitational pull that light cannot escape.


Such an event could be happening at the centre of our galaxy; Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez, who shared the Nobel Prize with Sir Roger, provided the most compelling evidence of a supermassive black hole in the centre of our galaxy.


There is a chance that the timescale for a black hole's complete evaporation is longer than the age of our present universe and hence cannot be detected.


“I claim that there is observation of Hawking radiation. The Big Bang was not the beginning. There was something before the Big Bang and that something is what we will have in our future”, Sir Roger said, according to The Telegraph.

“We have a universe that expands and expands, and all mass decays away, and in this crazy theory of mine, that remote future becomes the Big Bang of another aeon.

“So our Big Bang began with something which was the remote future of a previous aeon and there would have been similar black holes evaporating away, via Hawking evaporation, and they would produce these points in the sky, that I call Hawking Points.

“We are seeing them. These points are about eight times the diameter of the Moon and are slightly warmed up regions. There is pretty good evidence for at least six of these points.”


Many people have criticized the theory, and the existence of the type of radiation emitted by these black holes has yet to be proved.


Furthermore, since an infinitely vast universe in one existence must become an infinitely small cosmos in the next, all particles must lose mass as the universe ages, a concept that has also been received with skepticism.


According to conventional cosmology, the cosmos experienced a brief expansion or 'inflation' following the Big Bang, which would have removed anomalies in the universe's structure.


Sir Roger said that black holes were likewise disregarded as simply being in mathematics until their reality was proven. 


"People were very skeptical at the time, it took a long time before black holes were accepted... their importance is, I think, only partially appreciated”, he said, as reported by the BBC.


Reference(s): The Telegraph, BBC

Scientist Finds “Evidence” of Another Universe Before This One

According to research, there was a previous cosmos that existed before ours. This is referred regarded as a form of everlasting cosmic cycle.


“The next universe will be just like ours — but only in overall appearance, not in detail, of course…”


It's possible that a scientist has discovered substantial evidence that there was another universe before this one. In addition, he asserts that our universe is only the latest in an endless string of universes. Professor Sir Roger Penrose thinks that the universe we presently understand is the most recent in a lengthy chain of past universes in order to explain what was "there" before the Big Bang.


Another Universe Existed Prior to This One


According to Professor Sir Roger Penrose, a former colleague of late Professor Hawking, our cosmos still bears the wounds of the events that destroyed our universe's predecessor 14 billion years ago.


Prof. Penrose, an Oxford University researcher, is one of the world's most eminent theoretical physicists. He claims that the facts show that our world is just the most recent of an infinite series of universes, each of which sprung like phoenixes from its predecessor in a Big Bang.


According to mainstream scientific beliefs, the cosmos and everything in it—stars, planets, and galaxies—appeared out of nowhere as a result of strange, mostly unknown subatomic rules.


The inflation model of the universe's formation was regarded as a groundbreaking hypothesis when it was first proposed in the 1970s. However, as we discover more about the cosmos and conduct more research, this concept loses relevance.


According to a cyclic perspective of the cosmos, the answer to the issue of what was before our universe is simple: another one.


Prof. Penrose has been working on this idea with colleagues in the United States and Poland. They base their claims on studies of radiation left over from the Big Bang, and they believe they have finally discovered evidence of universes that existed before ours.


Astronomers detected this radiation, which exists as microwaves across space, for the first time in the middle of the 1960s.


However, studies have discovered that this radiation is not distributed uniformly throughout the universe. Astronomers believe that the turbulence that happened when our universe was born is what caused this distribution disparity.


However, Professor Penrose and his colleagues claim that this radiation reveals regular patterns that could have occurred in an earlier, parallel universe.


Prof. Penrose and his colleagues propose that our cosmic ancestor may have had supermassive black holes. These black holes would have eaten all stuff in the prior cosmos over billions of years.


Countless millions of years later, in blasts of so-called Hawking Radiation, these huge black holes perished as well.


Reference(s): Research paper